Whitley v. Nassau County Sheriff's Office

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided May 22, 2025·No. 3:25-cv-00441·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL E. WHITLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:25-cv-441-MMH-MCR

BILL LEEPER in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Nassau County, Florida,

Defendant.

ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff, Michael E. Whitley’s, Renewed Motion to Remand to State Court (Doc. 20; Motion), filed May 16, 2025. Upon review of the Motion and Whitley’s Second Amended Complaint for Reimbursement of Expenses (Doc. 19; Second Amended Complaint), filed May 16, 2025, which Whitley filed in response to the Court’s Order (Doc. 10; Order to File an Amended Complaint), entered May 5, 2025, the Court finds it appropriate to direct Defendant, Bill Leeper, to file an expedited response to the Motion. Leeper removed this action contending the Court had original jurisdiction over Whitley’s civil rights claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3) and supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. See Notice of Removal (Doc. 1; Notice), filed April 23, 2025, at ¶¶ 2, 3. But in the Second Amended Complaint, Whitley brings only one claim, for “Reimbursement of Expenses Under Florida Law.” See Second Amended Complaint ¶¶ 12–15. He

disclaims that he seeks relief under federal law. Id. ¶ 1. Because Whitley has clarified that he pursues only a state law claim and there is no apparent basis for the court to exercise original jurisdiction over that claim, the Court cannot discern any claim over which it has original jurisdiction. As such, the Court

notes that supplemental jurisdiction is likely improper. See Royal Canin U. S. A., Inc., v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. 22, 25–26 (2025) (holding that when an action is removed to federal court on federal question jurisdiction and the court exercises supplemental jurisdiction over related state law claims, the court

must remand the action if a subsequent amendment to the complaint drops all federal claims). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: On or before May 29, 2025, Defendant, Bill Leeper in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Nassau County, shall respond to Plaintiffs Renewed Motion to Remand to State Court (Doc. 20). DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 22nd day of May, 2025.

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD United States District Judge

1e33 Copies to: Pro Se Party Counsel of Record

□□□

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitley v. Nassau County Sheriff's Office, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Whitley v. Nassau County Sheriff's Office (Whitley v. Nassau County Sheriff's Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger
604 U.S. 22 (Supreme Court, 2025)