Whitley v. . Kafir

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Whitley v. . Kafir

108 S.E. 927, 182 N.C. 760, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 323

DecidedSeptember 21, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 927 (Whitley v. . Kafir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitley v. . Kafir, 108 S.E. 927, 182 N.C. 760, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 323 (N.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exception in tbe record relates to bis Honor’s refusal to give one of plaintiff’s special prayers for instructions. While tbe prayer, as requested, probably states a correct principle of law, as an abstract proposition, yet we think it was properly refused under tbe evidence in tbe instant case. It omitted all reference to tbe marked lines; and these should bave been considered by tbe jury, even under tbe facts stated in tbe prayer.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exception in tbe record relates to bis Honor’s refusal to give one of plaintiff’s special prayers for instructions. While tbe prayer, as requested, probably states a correct principle of law, as an abstract proposition, yet we think it was properly refused under tbe evidence in tbe instant case. It omitted all reference to tbe marked lines; and these should bave been considered by tbe jury, even under tbe facts stated in tbe prayer.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 927, 182 N.C. 760, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitley-v-kafir-nc-1921.