Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Whitley v. . Bottling Works

Whitley v. . Bottling Works

182 S.E. 108, 208 N.C. 846, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 167
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 1, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 182 S.E. 108 (Whitley v. . Bottling Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitley v. . Bottling Works, 182 S.E. 108, 208 N.C. 846, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 167 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages for alleged negligent injury caused by particles of jagged and broken glass in a bottle of Coca-Cola manufactured by the defendants and swallowed by plaintiff, the ultimate consumer, who purchased the same from a dealer.

There was a verdict of $250 and judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal, assigning error. The evidence brings the case within the principles announced in Perry v.Bottling Co., 196 N.C. 175, 145 S.E. 14; Broom v. Bottling Co.,200 N.C. 55, 156 S.E. 152; Enloe v. Bottling Co., ante, 309.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
145 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Broom v. Monroe Coca Cola Bottling Co.
156 S.E. 152 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 S.E. 108, 208 N.C. 846, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitley-v-bottling-works-nc-1935.