Whitlatch v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

1968 OK 6, 441 P.2d 956, 1968 Okla. LEXIS 274
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 23, 1968·No. 41143·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

BERRY, Justice.

This appeal concerns the correctness of the trial court’s action sustaining a motion for directed verdict and entering judgment for defendant in error, in an action brought by plaintiff in error as beneficiary, to recover upon an insurance policy issued by the defendant company.

Defendant issued a group life insurance policy to the Oklahoma Bar Association Group Insurance Trust. Under this group policy insurance coverage was extended to active members of the Oklahoma Bar without medical examination. On May 10, 1961, plaintiff’s decedent, an active lawyer 69 years of age, made written application and paid the required premium for a $5,-000.00 policy. The application was approved and the policy issued, effective June 1, 1961.

The written application for insurance contained the following matter:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitlatch v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 1968 OK 6, 441 P.2d 956, 1968 Okla. LEXIS 274 (Okla. 1968).

1968 OK 6 (Whitlatch v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benson v. Leaders Life Insurance Co.
2012 OK 111 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)
Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Tolliver
2005 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2005)
Harkrider v. Posey
2000 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2000)
Hays v. Jackson National Life Insurance
105 F.3d 583 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Hays v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company
105 F.3d 583 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Roark v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
731 P.2d 389 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)