Whiting v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New York

37 N.Y. 600
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 5, 1868·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In this case the appellants had, in the court below, demurred to the complaint. The demurrer being overruled, with leave to answer, they declined to answer, submitted to the judgment, and, on the affirmance in the General Term, appealed to this court. On the argument here, the appellants urged that, if the judgment should be affirmed, leave should now be given to them to answer the complaint. The court are unanimous in holding, that,

Where a pleading is sustained, the demurrer being overruled, and leave is given to answer the pleading, the demurrant is put to his election to answer over or submit to judgment; and if he submit to judgment, the judgment is final. If he appeal therefrom to this court, such appeal comes here on the question of affirmance or reversal only; and no leave to the demurrant to answer or plead anew can be given. The judgment here is absolutely final. *Page 601

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whiting v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New York, 37 N.Y. 600 (N.Y. 1868).

37 N.Y. 600 (Whiting v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edelman v. Edelman
228 P.2d 408 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1951)
Pollak v. Dodge Manufacturing Co.
80 Misc. 182 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1913)
White v. Jackson
39 Misc. 218 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)
Piper v. . Hoard
13 N.E. 626 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Fisher v. Gould
9 Daly 144 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1879)
Tradesmen's National Bank v. McFeely
10 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 699 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)