Whiting v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whiting v. State

141 A.D.2d 723, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A.D.2d 723 (Whiting v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whiting v. State, 141 A.D.2d 723, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for leave to file late notices of intention to file a claim, the petitioners appeal (1) from an order of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated May 21, 1986, which denied their motion, and (2) as limited by the appellants’ brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated September 16, 1986, as upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 21, 1986 is dismissed, as it was superseded by the order dated September 16, 1986 made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 16, 1986 is affirmed insofar as appealed from, for reasons stated by Justice Silver-man at the Court of Claims; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for leave to file late notices of intention to file a claim, the petitioners appeal (1) from an order of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated May 21, 1986, which denied their motion, and (2) as limited by the appellants’ brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated September 16, 1986, as upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 21, 1986 is dismissed, as it was superseded by the order dated September 16, 1986 made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 16, 1986 is affirmed insofar as appealed from, for reasons stated by Justice Silver-man at the Court of Claims; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A.D.2d 723, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiting-v-state-nyappdiv-1988.