Whiting v. Standard Gas-Light Co.

31 N.Y.S. 1135, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 883
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 31 N.Y.S. 1135 (Whiting v. Standard Gas-Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whiting v. Standard Gas-Light Co., 31 N.Y.S. 1135, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 883 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was such evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant, and absence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff, as justified the submission of the case to the jury. The appellant contends that excessive damages were awarded bv the verdict. If we were inclined to the view that the evidence before us would justify such contention, still we could not interfere with the judgment, because the record does not inform us that it contains all the evidence. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.Y.S. 1135, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiting-v-standard-gas-light-co-nysupct-1894.