Whiting v. Pettus

1 Tex. 191
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1846
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tex. 191 (Whiting v. Pettus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whiting v. Pettus, 1 Tex. 191 (Tex. 1846).

Opinion

Hemphill, C. J.

The judgment of the court was rendered on the 3d of July, 1840, and the motion now is to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the bond executed by appellant is insufficient, and not in conformity with the law regulating the subject matter at the time the appeal was taken. The bond is wholly defective. The signatures of the obligors are attached to the instrument, but the name of the obligee, the title of the cause, the court where tried and the amount of the penalty are not inserted. It is nothing more than the form of an appeal bond in blank, and could be as well filled up in any other cause as in the one before the court.

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the appeal be dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tex. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiting-v-pettus-tex-1846.