Whiting v. Jewel

Connecticut Superior Court

Whiting v. Jewel

1 Kirby 1

DecidedFebruary 15, 1786

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 1 (Whiting v. Jewel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whiting v. Jewel, 1 Kirby 1 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Pincite

Opinions

By the Court.

In taking depositions within this state, the statute requires notice to the adverse party, if within twenty miles: As to those taken out,of the state, which the statute in strictness does not extend to, and which can only be admitted on the ground of their being so taken as to come fully within the equity of the statute; there ought to be notice to the adverse party or to his known agent or attorney, if either are within twenty miles of the place of caption; which not having been given in this case the deposition is not admissible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

In taking depositions within this state, the statute requires notice to the adverse party, if within twenty miles: As to those taken out,of the state, which the statute in strictness does not extend to, and which can only be admitted on the ground of their being so taken as to come fully within the equity of the statute; there ought to be notice to the adverse party or to his known agent or attorney, if either are within twenty miles of the place of caption; which not having been given in this case the deposition is not admissible.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiting-v-jewel-connsuperct-1786.