Whiting v. Hollister
2 Mass. 102
Opinion
denied the motion, because this provision was made for the security of the defendant, which, if he pleased, he might waive; and if, at the term the writ is returned, he does not except to the want of an endorser, either by a plea in abatement, or perhaps by moving the Court to nonsuit the plaintiff, he must be considered as having waived the security provided for his benefit.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whiting v. Hollister, 2 Mass. 102 (Mass. 1806).
2 Mass. 102 (Whiting v. Hollister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. Commonwealth
1 Mass. 347 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1805)
Gilbert v. President of the Nantucket Bank
5 Mass. 97 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1809)