Whiting v. Cochran

9 Mass. 532
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1813
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 9 Mass. 532 (Whiting v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whiting v. Cochran, 9 Mass. 532 (Mass. 1813).

Opinion

By the Court.

The plaintiff in error has assigned for error that no issue was joined in the original action. But the record before us says otherwise, and we are bound by the record. If, however, it were true that the plaintiff below had neglected to join the issue tendered, and had gone to trial, and the defendant had appeared and [466]*466defended the action before the jury, the verdict would have been good, and the judgment to be supported.

As to the want of service on Dexter, one of the supposed trus tees of the defendant, he is alone interested in that question, and the plaintiff in error loses nothing by the erroneous proceeding against him. If Dexter were to bring his writ of error, we should reverse only that part of the judgment which awards execution against Whiting’s effects in his hands.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Beatty
41 S.E. 434 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1902)
French v. Peters
59 N.E. 449 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Mead v. West Pub. Co.
80 F. 380 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, 1896)
State v. Aler
20 S.E. 585 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1894)
Vinal v. Spofford
29 N.E. 288 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Huling v. Florida Savings Bank & Real Estate Exchange
19 Fla. 695 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1883)
Solomons v. Chesley
57 N.H. 163 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1876)
Averill v. Mathes
55 N.H. 617 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1875)
Joyes v. Hamilton
73 Ky. 544 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1874)
Buffum v. Ramsdell
55 Me. 252 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1867)
Maxwell v. Potter
47 Me. 487 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1860)
Dufolt v. Gorman
1 Minn. 301 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1856)
Ellis v. Bullard
65 Mass. 496 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1853)
Riley v. Waugh
62 Mass. 220 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1851)
Kellogg v. Larkin
3 Pin. 123 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1851)
Lincoln v. Tower
15 F. Cas. 544 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois, 1841)
King v. Lacey
8 Conn. 499 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1831)
Wallace v. Blanchard
3 N.H. 395 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1826)
Shaw v. Redmond
11 Serg. & Rawle 27 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1824)
Jordan v. Cooper
3 Serg. & Rawle 564 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1817)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Mass. 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiting-v-cochran-mass-1813.