Whitfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Whitfield v. State

1910 OK CR 90, 111 P. 688, 3 Okla. Crim. 696, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 9, 1910

DocketNo. A-237.

StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 90 (Whitfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitfield v. State, 1910 OK CR 90, 111 P. 688, 3 Okla. Crim. 696, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jim Whitfield, was convicted in the country court of Carter county of the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and was on the 29th day of January, 1909, sentenced to be confined in the.county jail for á term of thirty days and pay a fine of fifty dollars. From which judgment he appealed by filing in this court on July 5, 1909, his petition in error with case made attached. No briefs have been filed and we are not advised as to' what plaintiff in error relies upon for a- reversal of'said judgment. Counsel for the state has filed S' motion to dismiss or affirm for want of prosecution. ‘ We *697 have examined the record and no error is apparent. The motion to affirm is allowed and the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed. The clerk of this court will issue mandate to the county court of Carter county, directing said county court to cause the judgment and sentence to be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jim Whitfield, was convicted in the country court of Carter county of the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and was on the 29th day of January, 1909, sentenced to be confined in the.county jail for á term of thirty days and pay a fine of fifty dollars. From which judgment he appealed by filing in this court on July 5, 1909, his petition in error with case made attached. No briefs have been filed and we are not advised as to' what plaintiff in error relies upon for a- reversal of'said judgment. Counsel for the state has filed S' motion to dismiss or affirm for want of prosecution. ‘ We *697 have examined the record and no error is apparent. The motion to affirm is allowed and the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed. The clerk of this court will issue mandate to the county court of Carter county, directing said county court to cause the judgment and sentence to be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1910 OK CR 90, 111 P. 688, 3 Okla. Crim. 696, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.