Whitfield v. State
This text of 276 S.E.2d 841 (Whitfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The single jurisdictional ground of this appeal from a conviction of bribery under Code Ann. § 26-2301 (2) (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1249,1305) is an argument that the cited Code section is unconstitutional as vague and ambiguous, and making the mere receipt of a “benefit, reward or consideration to which he is not entitled” a crime without criminal intent on the part of the receiver, as well as of the giver. The constitutionality of this statute has been upheld against such an attack in King v. State, 246 Ga. 386 (2) (271 SE2d 630) (1980).
No issue remaining which would invoke this court’s jurisdiction, the appeal will be transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 S.E.2d 841, 247 Ga. 367, 1981 Ga. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-state-ga-1981.