Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr.
This text of Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr. (Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MICHAEL WHITFI ELD, No. 85067 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA FILED DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AS EMPLOYER, AUG 0 2022 Respondent. ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF qPREME COURT BY • DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for collateral estoppel. Having reviewed the petition, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. Petitioner has failed to include with his petition necessary documentation supporting his request for relief. NRAP 21(a)(4) (petitioner must provide all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition); NRAP 21(c) (petitions for extraordinary writs shall to the extent practicable conform to NRAP 21(a)). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
J. Hardesty
J. Stiglich SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
,141.177 cc: Michael Whitfield Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
101 ILM7A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-state-dept-of-corr-nev-2022.