Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 4, 2022·No. 85067·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL WHITFI ELD, No. 85067 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA FILED DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AS EMPLOYER, AUG 0 2022 Respondent. ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF qPREME COURT BY •

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for collateral estoppel. Having reviewed the petition, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. Petitioner has failed to include with his petition necessary documentation supporting his request for relief. NRAP 21(a)(4) (petitioner must provide all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition); NRAP 21(c) (petitions for extraordinary writs shall to the extent practicable conform to NRAP 21(a)). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

J.

Hardesty

J.

Stiglich

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

,141.177

cc: Michael Whitfield

Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

101 ILM7A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr., (Neb. 2022).

Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr. (Whitfield v. State, Dep'T Of Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.