Whitfield v. State

920 S.W.2d 855, 324 Ark. 460, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whitfield v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 326 Ark. 762
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 20, 1996·No. CR 96-522·Published

Opinion

Per CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles Lee Whitfield, by his attorney, Mikke Connealy, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the transcript was tendered late due to an error on her part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dudley, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield v. State, 920 S.W.2d 855, 324 Ark. 460, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 288 (Ark. 1996).

920 S.W.2d 855 (Whitfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)