Whitfield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

613 F.3d 1318, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16490, 2010 WL 3153250
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 2010
DocketNo. 08-16162
StatusPublished

This text of 613 F.3d 1318 (Whitfield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitfield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 613 F.3d 1318, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16490, 2010 WL 3153250 (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and EDMONDSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. See Whitfield v. McNeil, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3451, - L.Ed. 2d -. We denied Petitioner’s application for a Certificate of Appealability, relying on our decision in Holland v. Florida, 539 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir.2008). Then, the Supreme Court reversed our judgment in Holland, and remanded that case for further consideration. Holland v. Florida, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010). We therefore remand this case to the district court for fact finding and further proceedings — including, if it is necessary, an evidentiary hearing— consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion and judgment in Holland.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Florida
177 L. Ed. 2d 130 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Whitfield v. McNeil
177 L. Ed. 2d 1052 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Holland v. State
539 F.3d 1334 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 F.3d 1318, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16490, 2010 WL 3153250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-secretary-department-of-corrections-ca11-2010.