Whitfield v. Johnson

255 A.D.2d 949, 680 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12198

This text of 255 A.D.2d 949 (Whitfield v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitfield v. Johnson, 255 A.D.2d 949, 680 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination finding petitioner guilty of violating inmate rule 113.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii]) is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Symmonds v Goord, 244 AD2d 737; Matter of Larocco v Coughlin, 181 AD2d 957). We reject petitioner’s contentions concerning the testing that was done and the procedures that were followed. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Punch, J.) Present — Green, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larocco v. Coughlin
181 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Symmonds v. Goord
244 A.D.2d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D.2d 949, 680 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1998.