Whitfield v. Democratic Party

Eighth Circuit

Whitfield v. Democratic Party

902 F.2d 15

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 1990

DocketNo. 88-1953

StatusPublished

This text of 902 F.2d 15 (Whitfield v. Democratic Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitfield v. Democratic Party, 902 F.2d 15 (8th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, a panel of this court, Judge Bright, dissenting, reversed the judgment of the district court. Whitfield v. The Democratic Party, 890 F.2d 1423 (8th Cir.1989). After rehearing en banc, the judgment is now affirmed by an equally divided court. Judges Bright, Arnold, Bowman, Wollman and Magill vote to affirm the district court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg and Beam would reverse. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, a panel of this court, Judge Bright, dissenting, reversed the judgment of the district court. Whitfield v. The Democratic Party, 890 F.2d 1423 (8th Cir.1989). After rehearing en banc, the judgment is now affirmed by an equally divided court. Judges Bright, Arnold, Bowman, Wollman and Magill vote to affirm the district court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg and Beam would reverse. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

902 F.2d 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-democratic-party-ca8-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack