Whitfield v. Democratic Party

Eighth Circuit

Whitfield v. Democratic Party

902 F.2d 15

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 4, 1990·No. No. 88-1953·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, a panel of this court, Judge Bright, dissenting, reversed the judgment of the district court. Whitfield v. The Democratic Party, 890 F.2d 1423 (8th Cir.1989). After rehearing en banc, the judgment is now affirmed by an equally divided court. Judges Bright, Arnold, Bowman, Wollman and Magill vote to affirm the district court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg and Beam would reverse. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, a panel of this court, Judge Bright, dissenting, reversed the judgment of the district court. Whitfield v. The Democratic Party, 890 F.2d 1423 (8th Cir.1989). After rehearing en banc, the judgment is now affirmed by an equally divided court. Judges Bright, Arnold, Bowman, Wollman and Magill vote to affirm the district court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg and Beam would reverse. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Whitfield v. Democratic Party, 902 F.2d 15 (8th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

902 F.2d 15 (Whitfield v. Democratic Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related