Whitfield v. Bailey
968 N.E.2d 994, 18 N.Y.3d 991, 945 N.Y.S.2d 639, 2012 NY Slip Op 71333, 2012 WL 1432211, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 821
This text of 968 N.E.2d 994 (Whitfield v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whitfield v. Bailey, 968 N.E.2d 994, 18 N.Y.3d 991, 945 N.Y.S.2d 639, 2012 NY Slip Op 71333, 2012 WL 1432211, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 821 (N.Y. 2012).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the October 2010 Supreme Court order, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portions of the order sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of O. v. M.
968 N.E.2d 994 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
968 N.E.2d 994, 18 N.Y.3d 991, 945 N.Y.S.2d 639, 2012 NY Slip Op 71333, 2012 WL 1432211, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-bailey-ny-2012.