Whitfield v. Artuz
215 A.D.2d 767, 627 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5694
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 1995
StatusPublished
This text of 215 A.D.2d 767 (Whitfield v. Artuz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whitfield v. Artuz, 215 A.D.2d 767, 627 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
Opinion
Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J), entered December 14, 1993.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Beisner at the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
215 A.D.2d 767, 627 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitfield-v-artuz-nyappdiv-1995.