Whitfield Properties, Inc. v. Stuart

Supreme Court of Florida

Whitfield Properties, Inc. v. Stuart

163 So. 701, 121 Fla. 178, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1536

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 11, 1935·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review final decree in suit to foreclose tax certificate. The appeal challenges the sufficiency of the allegations’ of the bill of complaint. We know of nothing that can be gained by discussing questions in regard to the right to foreclose tax certificates which have been issued to the State of Florda for the non-payment of taxes and have thereafter come into the hands of individual holders, which would be only a repetition of what we have heretofore held.

Sufficient to say that we have examined the record and find no reversible error. Therefore, the decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

• Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review final decree in suit to foreclose tax certificate. The appeal challenges the sufficiency of the allegations’ of the bill of complaint. We know of nothing that can be gained by discussing questions in regard to the right to foreclose tax certificates which have been issued to the State of Florda for the non-payment of taxes and have thereafter come into the hands of individual holders, which would be only a repetition of what we have heretofore held.

Sufficient to say that we have examined the record and find no reversible error. Therefore, the decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

• Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Whitfield Properties, Inc. v. Stuart, 163 So. 701, 121 Fla. 178, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1536 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

163 So. 701 (Whitfield Properties, Inc. v. Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.