Whiteside v. Wilkerson

297 P. 15, 211 Cal. 752, 1931 Cal. LEXIS 756
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1931
DocketDocket No. L.A. 10822.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 297 P. 15 (Whiteside v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whiteside v. Wilkerson, 297 P. 15, 211 Cal. 752, 1931 Cal. LEXIS 756 (Cal. 1931).

Opinion

THE COURT.

This appeal is from a judgment directing the defendant and appellant to pay to the plaintiff and respondent the sum of fifty dollars per month for the support of the illegitimate minor child of plaintiff and defendant. The respondent has filed no brief herein either originally or after the issuance and service upon her of an order to show cause. We have, however, examined the entire record with a view to determining the merits of the only two points presented by the appellant upon this appeal. As to the first of these, to the effect that the evidence was not sufficient to justify the court in making the judgment appealed from, we find the appellant’s contention in this regard to be utterly without merit, and the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court to be fully supported by the evidence in the case. As to appellant’s second contention that the court did not require, nor did the plaintiff offer, upon the trial any evidence showing the amount of money necessary for the support and maintenance of the alleged minor child, we find it also to be without the semblance of merit. The trial court had the parties before it and investigated the station in life of each as well as the earning capacity of the defendant and the condition and needs of the mother and child. The evidence educed as to these matters furnished the trial court all that was necessary to enable it to determine what amount would be reasonable for the support of the child. The order made thereon was moderate and was fully supported by the evidence in the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stargell v. Stargell
263 Cal. App. 2d 504 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)
Berry v. Chaplin
169 P.2d 453 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 P. 15, 211 Cal. 752, 1931 Cal. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiteside-v-wilkerson-cal-1931.