Whiteside v. Duke

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee
DecidedMay 30, 2019
Docket1:17-cv-01106
StatusUnknown

This text of Whiteside v. Duke (Whiteside v. Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whiteside v. Duke, (W.D. Tenn. 2019).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

CEDRICK WHITESIDE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) No. 1:17-cv-1106-JDT-cgc ) BRIAN DUKE, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A NON-PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT OR PAY THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE CIVIL FILING FEE

On June 5, 2017, Plaintiff Cedrick Whiteside, who was, at the time, incarcerated at the Henderson County Criminal Justice Complex in Lexington, Tennessee, filed a pro se civil complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The Court issued an order on June 14, 2017, granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assessing the civil filing fee pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b). (ECF No. 7.) However, on December 20, 2018, Whiteside notified the Clerk he had been released. (ECF No. 23.) Under the PLRA, a prisoner bringing a civil action must pay the full filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The statute merely provides the prisoner the opportunity to make a “downpayment” of a partial filing fee and pay the remainder in monthly installments. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). However, in this case, only $3.23 of the filing fee was paid prior to Whiteside’s release. Under these circumstances, the Sixth Circuit has held “the obligation to pay the remainder of the fees is to be determined solely on the question of whether the released individual qualifies for pauper status.” McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601, 613 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013). Whiteside must either renew his pauper status or pay the remainder of the civil filing fee. Therefore, he is ORDERED to submit, on or before June 20, 2019, either a properly completed and signed non-prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit or the remaining $396.77

of the $400 civil filing fee.1 The Clerk shall mail Whiteside a copy of the non-prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit form along with this order. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 The civil filing fee is $350. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Under § 1914(b) and the Schedule of Fees set out following the statute, an administrative fee of $50 for filing any civil case also is required. Because that additional $50 fee does not apply if leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, only the $350 fee was assessed in the June 24, 2017, order. However, if Whiteside does not renew his pauper status he will be responsible for the entire $400 fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Whiteside v. Duke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiteside-v-duke-tnwd-2019.