Whiteside v. Burlant

151 Conn. 725

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whiteside v. Burlant. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 Conn. 204 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 5, 1963·Published

Opinion

The motion by the plaintiff that the judgment and sentence of the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County in No. 4144 be declared null, void and of no effect is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See General Statutes § 52-263; State v. Whiteside, 148 Conn. 208, 169 A.2d 260.

Loring J. Whiteside, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). George B. Tiernan, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant). Argued November 5 decided November 5, 1963

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loring J. Whiteside, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). George B. Tiernan, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant). Argued November 5 decided November 5, 1963

Whiteside v. Burlant, 151 Conn. 725 (Colo. 1963).

Pincite

151 Conn. 725 (Whiteside v. Burlant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Whiteside

169 A.2d 260 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1961)

Opinion

Related