Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Whitesell & Sons ex rel. Maul v. Peck

Whitesell & Sons ex rel. Maul v. Peck

35 A. 48, 176 Pa. 170, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1057
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 25, 1896
DocketNo. 238
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 35 A. 48 (Whitesell & Sons ex rel. Maul v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitesell & Sons ex rel. Maul v. Peck, 35 A. 48, 176 Pa. 170, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1057 (Pa. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is a proper cas'e for restitution. It might properly have been awarded by the court below, as the judgment was collected after the appeal to this court was taken and did not regularly appear as part of the record here. Having been brought to our attention however by petition and motion, we now have no hesitation in saying that a writ of restitution should issue out of the court below.

The writ is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metro Real Estate v. Siaway, M.
2021 Pa. Super. 31 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2021)
Marra v. Marra
113 A.2d 320 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
In Re Hoppe
108 A.2d 664 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Brennan v. Keller
47 Pa. D. & C. 490 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
In re Young's Estate
9 Alaska 158 (D. Alaska, 1937)
Reilly v. State
175 A. 582 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1934)
Wolongevicz v. Stegmaier Brewing Co.
61 Pa. Super. 70 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Stevenson v. Sons
10 Pa. Super. 306 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A. 48, 176 Pa. 170, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitesell-sons-ex-rel-maul-v-peck-pa-1896.