White's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

White's Estate

31 A. 569, 167 Pa. 206, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 877

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 75·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The learned president of the orphans’ court rightly held that [209]*209for the purpose of distribution the ground rents in question must be treated as realt3r and therefore subjects of partition. Ibis not our purpose, nor is it at all necessary, to add anything to what has been so well said by him in support of that position.'

On his opinion, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

The learned president of the orphans’ court rightly held that [209]*209for the purpose of distribution the ground rents in question must be treated as realt3r and therefore subjects of partition. Ibis not our purpose, nor is it at all necessary, to add anything to what has been so well said by him in support of that position.'

On his opinion, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.

White's Estate, 31 A. 569, 167 Pa. 206, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 877 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

31 A. 569 (White's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related