White's Bank v. Farthing

New York Supreme Court

White's Bank v. Farthing

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 675

DecidedOctober 15, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 675 (White's Bank v. Farthing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

White's Bank v. Farthing, 53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 675 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

First. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of tnat appeal. Second. The portion of the judgment appealed from by the plaintiffs is affirmed, with costs to the defendant Kelly, Third. The portion of [676]*676the judgment relating to the conveyance made hy Matilda Earthing to William J. Earthing, of dale May 18, 188‘<?, of lot on south side of Swan street, and so far as relates to that lot and the rents and profits thereof reversed, and a new trial of the issues relating to that conveyance granted, costs of this appeal to abide the event unless the plaintiffs stipulate within twenty days to so modify the judgment as to strike*’from it the provisions relating to such conveyance and premises and have it adjudged’ that as to such conveyance the complaint be dismissed on the merits, and in that event the judgment so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to the plaintiffs or the defendants Earthing. Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

order to be settled by Bradley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of tnat appeal. Second. The portion of the judgment appealed from by the plaintiffs is affirmed, with costs to the defendant Kelly, Third. The portion of [676]*676the judgment relating to the conveyance made hy Matilda Earthing to William J. Earthing, of dale May 18, 188‘<?, of lot on south side of Swan street, and so far as relates to that lot and the rents and profits thereof reversed, and a new trial of the issues relating to that conveyance granted, costs of this appeal to abide the event unless the plaintiffs stipulate within twenty days to so modify the judgment as to strike*’from it the provisions relating to such conveyance and premises and have it adjudged’ that as to such conveyance the complaint be dismissed on the merits, and in that event the judgment so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to the plaintiffs or the defendants Earthing. Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

order to be settled by Bradley, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whites-bank-v-farthing-nysupct-1887.