Whiters v. State
707 So. 2d 944, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1998 WL 191155
This text of 707 So. 2d 944 (Whiters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whiters v. State, 707 So. 2d 944, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1998 WL 191155 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
Because appellant has not shown that the actual sentence he received was “illegal” under rule 3.800(a), we affirm the denial of his unverified motion to correct illegal sentence, but without prejudice to his right to file a timely and verified motion under rule 3.850, raising the claims for credit made here.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
707 So. 2d 944, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662, 1998 WL 191155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiters-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.