Whitener v. C. C. & O. Railroad
157 N.C. 564
Opinion
Upon a review of the record in this case we are of opinion that his Honor correctly sustained the motion to nonsuit. House v. R. R., 152 N. C., 397, and cases cited; Dunn v. R. R., 151 N. C., 313. The injury was evidently the result of an accident, which the evidence fails to account for. Martin v. Manufacturing Co., 128 N. C., 264.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitener v. C. C. & O. Railroad, 157 N.C. 564 (N.C. 1911).
157 N.C. 564 (Whitener v. C. C. & O. Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
House v. Southern Railway Co.
67 S.E. 981 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
Dunn v. . R. R.
66 S.E. 134 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.
38 S.E. 876 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1901)