Whiteman v. Saratoga Kissingen Spring Co.

29 N.Y.S. 1151, 86 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 614, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 866
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1894·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An affirmance of the order under review Is required by the decision of this court in Bank v. Hall, 60 Hun, 466, 15 N. Y. Supp. 208. The order should therefore be affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whiteman v. Saratoga Kissingen Spring Co., 29 N.Y.S. 1151, 86 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 614, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 866 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

29 N.Y.S. 1151 (Whiteman v. Saratoga Kissingen Spring Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manufacturers' National Bank v. Hall
15 N.Y.S. 208 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)