Whitely v. Lobue
249 N.E.2d 476, 24 N.Y.2d 896
This text of 249 N.E.2d 476 (Whitely v. Lobue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whitely v. Lobue, 249 N.E.2d 476, 24 N.Y.2d 896 (N.Y. 1969).
Opinion
Roberta Whitely et al., Individually and as Natural Guardians of William Whitely and Another, Infants, Appellants,
v.
Andrew Lobue et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Albert A. Du Pont and James F. Niehoff for appellants.
Asher Marcus for respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN. Taking no part: Judge KEATING.
Order reversed, without costs, and the order of Special Term reinstated on the opinion at Special Term. Question certified answered in the negative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Forbes v. Plume
202 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Moller v. Lieber
156 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Possenti v. Lanza
54 A.D.2d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
249 N.E.2d 476, 24 N.Y.2d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitely-v-lobue-ny-1969.