Whitely v. Lo Bue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whitely v. Lo Bue

30 A.D.2d 552, 291 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4049

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 552 (Whitely v. Lo Bue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitely v. Lo Bue, 30 A.D.2d 552, 291 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4049 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 8, 1967, which, on reargument, adhered to the original decision granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (directing an assessment of damages), reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs, and plaintiffs’ motion denied. Appeal from order of said court dated July 31, 1967 dismissed, without costs. The order was superseded by the order dated September 8, 1967, which granted reargument. In our opinion, the issues in this action should be tried and determined by a jury (see Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp., 17 N Y 2d 132; Rosenthal v. Monastra, 27 A D 2d 749; Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A D 2d 381). Brennan, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Christ, Acting P. J., and Rabin, J., concur in the dismissal of the appeal from the order dated July 31, 1967; and otherwise dissent and vote to affirm the order dated September 8, 1967 insofar as appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 8, 1967, which, on reargument, adhered to the original decision granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (directing an assessment of damages), reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs, and plaintiffs’ motion denied. Appeal from order of said court dated July 31, 1967 dismissed, without costs. The order was superseded by the order dated September 8, 1967, which granted reargument. In our opinion, the issues in this action should be tried and determined by a jury (see Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp., 17 N Y 2d 132; Rosenthal v. Monastra, 27 A D 2d 749; Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A D 2d 381). Brennan, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Christ, Acting P. J., and Rabin, J., concur in the dismissal of the appeal from the order dated July 31, 1967; and otherwise dissent and vote to affirm the order dated September 8, 1967 insofar as appealed from.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 552, 291 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitely-v-lo-bue-nyappdiv-1968.