Whitelock v. Bergquist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whitelock v. Bergquist

238 A.D. 564, 264 N.Y.S. 270, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9549

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 238 A.D. 564 (Whitelock v. Bergquist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitelock v. Bergquist, 238 A.D. 564, 264 N.Y.S. 270, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Operation and control of the automobile having been admitted by failure to deny in the answer it was unnecessary to permit an examination before trial on those subjects. The order so far as it permitted an examination with reference to other matters was erroneous and should be reversed.

The entire order, being erroneous, should, therefore, be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to vacate the notice of examination granted.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI