Whiteleaf Steamship Co. v. Ayer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Whiteleaf Steamship Co. v. Ayer

39 A. 1118, 184 Pa. 449, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 919

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 24, 1898

DocketAppeal, No. 275

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A. 1118 (Whiteleaf Steamship Co. v. Ayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whiteleaf Steamship Co. v. Ayer, 39 A. 1118, 184 Pa. 449, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 919 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Each of the twenty-two specifications charges error in dismissing defendants’ exceptions to the learned referee’s report, recited therein respectively. Some of these exceptions relate to several of the referee’s findings of fact, others to his omission to find certain facts, and the others to his conclusions of law, etc.

A careful consideration of the record has failed to disclose any error therein that would justify us in sustaining either of said specifications. There is nothing in any of them that requires discussion. On the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, all of which were approved by the court below, we think the judgment should be affirmed.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Each of the twenty-two specifications charges error in dismissing defendants’ exceptions to the learned referee’s report, recited therein respectively. Some of these exceptions relate to several of the referee’s findings of fact, others to his omission to find certain facts, and the others to his conclusions of law, etc.

A careful consideration of the record has failed to disclose any error therein that would justify us in sustaining either of said specifications. There is nothing in any of them that requires discussion. On the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, all of which were approved by the court below, we think the judgment should be affirmed.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A. 1118, 184 Pa. 449, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whiteleaf-steamship-co-v-ayer-pa-1898.