Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Whitehurst v. State

Whitehurst v. State

744 So. 2d 1132, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 1999 WL 973635
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 1999
DocketNo. 99-02543
StatusPublished

This text of 744 So. 2d 1132 (Whitehurst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehurst v. State, 744 So. 2d 1132, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 1999 WL 973635 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Whitehurst appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The order denying Whitehurst’s motion is reversed and remanded for further proceedings because the record before this court does not contain a copy of the motion, which was misplaced at the trial level. See Weeks v. State, 728 So.2d 323 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). On remand, Whitehurst has sixty days in which to file an identical motion with the trial court.

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weeks v. State
728 So. 2d 323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 So. 2d 1132, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, 1999 WL 973635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehurst-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.