Whitehurst v. Perry Township

680 N.E.2d 1004, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1209
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 16, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1114
StatusPublished

This text of 680 N.E.2d 1004 (Whitehurst v. Perry Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehurst v. Perry Township, 680 N.E.2d 1004, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1209 (Ohio 1997).

Opinions

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.' Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuljevic v. Midland-Ross Corp.
403 N.E.2d 986 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 N.E.2d 1004, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehurst-v-perry-township-ohio-1997.