Whitehurst v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
149 S.E. 924, 197 N.C. 790, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 382
This text of 149 S.E. 924 (Whitehurst v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whitehurst v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance, 149 S.E. 924, 197 N.C. 790, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 382 (N.C. 1929).
Opinion
This is an injunction proceeding to restrain the sale of certain land by George A. Grimsley, trustee. The'court below by agreement found the facts. The conclusions of law were as follows:
*791 “1. That Lydia 0. Smith was surety only on the note of her husband, L. E. Smith, to the Security Life and Annuity Company.
2. That Lydia 0. Smith, wife of L. E. Smith and beneficiary in the life insurance policy, has a vested interest and property therein.
3. That the equitable doctrine invoked by the plaintiff does not apply.
4. That, restraining order should be dissolved.”
¥e have read the record and briefs carefully. We are of the opinion that the judgment of the court below was correct.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
149 S.E. 924, 197 N.C. 790, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehurst-v-jefferson-standard-life-insurance-nc-1929.