Whitehurst v. Hathorn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Whitehurst v. Hathorn

57 S.E. 682, 128 Ga. 406, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 121

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 17, 1907

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 S.E. 682 (Whitehurst v. Hathorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitehurst v. Hathorn, 57 S.E. 682, 128 Ga. 406, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 121 (Ga. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

The only issue raised to the return of proeessioners being whether a line run and marked by them, was “the true original land line,” and the evidence on the trial being amply sufficient to authorize the finding in the affirmative, the refusal of a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence was not error-

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Processioning. Before Judge Lewis. Wilkinson superior court. July 9, 1906.

F. Chambers & Son, for plaintiff in error. Lindsey & Carswell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI