Whitehurst v. Hathorn

57 S.E. 682, 128 Ga. 406, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 121
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 17, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

The only issue raised to the return of proeessioners being whether a line run and marked by them, was “the true original land line,” and the evidence on the trial being amply sufficient to authorize the finding in the affirmative, the refusal of a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence was not error-

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Processioning. Before Judge Lewis. Wilkinson superior court. July 9, 1906. F. Chambers & Son, for plaintiff in error. Lindsey & Carswell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitehurst v. Hathorn, 57 S.E. 682, 128 Ga. 406, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 121 (Ga. 1907).

57 S.E. 682 (Whitehurst v. Hathorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lansford v. Gatliff
166 S.E.2d 639 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)