Whitehurst v. Davis.

3 N.C. 113
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1800·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per :;urhhi.

Qu.r constitution declares, that in all controver-ri-s at law inspecting property, the ancient mode of trial by ■Jury, is otic o' the best securities of the righto of the people, and ought to remain sacred and inviolable. It may be said, if :AS concur in a verdict, 12 must necessarily have given their assent. Bit any innovation amounting in the least degree to a departure frena the ancient mode, may cause a departure in Other inzlraces, and in the end, endanger or pervert this excellent inst'ifr.roa from its usual course ; therefore no such innovation should be permitted.

'¿'he judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitehurst v. Davis., 3 N.C. 113 (N.C. Ct. App. 1800).

3 N.C. 113 (Whitehurst v. Davis.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AVR Davis Raleigh, LLC v. Triangle Constr. Co.
818 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
State v. Bunning
485 S.E.2d 290 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1997)
State v. Alston
204 S.E.2d 860 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)