Whitehurst v. Cougill
This text of 697 F. App'x 342 (Whitehurst v. Cougill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having read all of Appellant’s brief and also the complaint that was filed to initiate the lawsuit. There is no legal claim of error that would give this court jurisdiction to change the judgment of the district court. Appellant has written well about historical problems and even about courts’ jurisdiction, but he fails to allege any legal right of his that has been violated or personal injury suffered as a consequence, This court must affirm the judgment appealed.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 F. App'x 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehurst-v-cougill-ca5-2017.