Whitehurst v. City of Mobile

Alabama Court of Appeals

Whitehurst v. City of Mobile

124 So. 667, 23 Ala. App. 307, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 245

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 19, 1929

Docket1 Div. 870.

StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 667 (Whitehurst v. City of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitehurst v. City of Mobile, 124 So. 667, 23 Ala. App. 307, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 245 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRIGKEN, P. J.

In appeals of this character the law requires assignment of errors and brief by appellant as in civil cases. Upon investigation of this record we find that this law has not been complied with; there are no assignment of errors, nor appellant’s brief on file. The cause is here submitted upon motion of appellee to affirm the judgment from which this appeal was taken. For the reasons stated, the motion is granted, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRIGKEN, P. J.

In appeals of this character the law requires assignment of errors and brief by appellant as in civil cases. Upon investigation of this record we find that this law has not been complied with; there are no assignment of errors, nor appellant’s brief on file. The cause is here submitted upon motion of appellee to affirm the judgment from which this appeal was taken. For the reasons stated, the motion is granted, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 So. 667, 23 Ala. App. 307, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehurst-v-city-of-mobile-alactapp-1929.