Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Whitehouse v. State

Whitehouse v. State

777 So. 2d 1086, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 230, 2001 WL 38682
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3361·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Whitehouse appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice. Whitehouse may raise the Heggs1 issue in a motion to withdraw his plea filed pursuant to rule 3.850. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Jenkins v. State, 771 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitehouse v. State, 777 So. 2d 1086, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 230, 2001 WL 38682 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

777 So. 2d 1086 (Whitehouse v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Jenkins v. State
771 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)