Whitehouse v. Delap

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whitehouse v. Delap

248 A.D. 834, 290 N.Y.S. 177, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7541

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 834 (Whitehouse v. Delap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitehouse v. Delap, 248 A.D. 834, 290 N.Y.S. 177, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action based on a promissory note affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Although we regard the defense as insufficient in so far as it relates to the alleged fraudulent misrepresentation of value because of an omission to allege lack of knowledge at the time of the giving of the renewal note in question, we construe the defense to plead a conditional delivery of the renewal note in that it was not to take effect nor to have valid existence until such time as the stock in question arrived at a value of twenty-five dollars a share or more. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in an action based on a promissory note affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Although we regard the defense as insufficient in so far as it relates to the alleged fraudulent misrepresentation of value because of an omission to allege lack of knowledge at the time of the giving of the renewal note in question, we construe the defense to plead a conditional delivery of the renewal note in that it was not to take effect nor to have valid existence until such time as the stock in question arrived at a value of twenty-five dollars a share or more. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 834, 290 N.Y.S. 177, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehouse-v-delap-nyappdiv-1936.