Whitehorn v. State
285 S.W.3d 355, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 379, 2009 WL 744131
Opinion
ORDER
Eric Whitehorn appeals from the denial after a hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. *356 After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitehorn v. State, 285 S.W.3d 355, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 379, 2009 WL 744131 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
285 S.W.3d 355 (Whitehorn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.