Whitehill v. Hartman Construction Co.
168 A.D. 928
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1915
StatusPublished
This text of 168 A.D. 928 (Whitehill v. Hartman Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whitehill v. Hartman Construction Co., 168 A.D. 928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Term affirmed, with costs, on [929]*929the opinion of Mr. Justice Blackmar (reported in 87 Misc. Rep. 184). Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented upon the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Kelly at the Appellate Term, with whom Burr, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Whitehill v. Hartman Construction Co.
87 Misc. 184 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 A.D. 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehill-v-hartman-construction-co-nyappdiv-1915.