Whitehead v. . Whitehead

64 N.C. 538
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 N.C. 538 (Whitehead v. . Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehead v. . Whitehead, 64 N.C. 538 (N.C. 1870).

Opinion

Bead®, J.

It was not controverted that the trust fund,, held as of the separate estate of the plaintiff, was appropriated to purchase the land in question, and that it was. agreed that the deed was to be made to Thomas Whitehead in trust for the plaintiff; but, by mistake of the draftsman, it was made to Marcellus Whitehead without any declaration of trust. It is a well settled principle of *540 equity that the plaintiff has the right to follow the fund, and to have the legal owner declared a trustee for her.

The defendants, Henderson and Ennis, bought the land at sale under execution against Marcellus Whitehead the legal owner, with notice of the plaintiff’s equity, and, of course, they are bound by it. Indeed, as they can take nothing under the sale but the interest of the defendant in the execution, they would be affected by the equity, without notice.

There is no error. Let this be certified, &c.

Per Curiam;. ' Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rugh v. Ottenheimer
6 Or. 231 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.C. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-whitehead-nc-1870.