Whitehead v. Texada

506 So. 2d 966, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 9499
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 7, 1987
DocketNo. W87-465
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 506 So. 2d 966 (Whitehead v. Texada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehead v. Texada, 506 So. 2d 966, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 9499 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

The trial court erred in not hearing the relators’ motion for disbursement of proceeds. Moody v. Arabie, 498 So.2d 1081 (La.1986) obligates an intervenor as well as the plaintiff to pay a portion of the costs of recovery, including attorney’s fees, under the circumstances and criteria set out in Moody, supra. Under La.C.C.P. art. 2088(7), the trial court is not divested of jurisdiction to hear the relators’ motion and decide the issues. IT IS ORDERED that the trial court hear the relators’ motion for disbursement of the proceeds of the judgment signed in this matter on January 26, 1987, which judgment is now subject to execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Denton v. Cormier
556 So. 2d 931 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)
Broussard v. Olin Corp.
546 So. 2d 1301 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
Whitehead v. Texada
520 So. 2d 416 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 So. 2d 966, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 9499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-texada-lactapp-1987.