Whitehead v. State

168 S.W. 530, 74 Tex. Crim. 475, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 24, 1914·No. No. 3188.·Published

Opinion

PREHDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for unlawfully cutting timber on the land of another and fined $10.

What purports to be a statement of facts, and bills of exceptions were not filed until nearly ninety days after "the court, at which appellant was tried, adjourned. The State makes a motion to strike them out on that account, which is granted. Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222; DeFriend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329, 153 S. W. Rep., 881; Stephens v. State, 158 S. W. Rep., 531-532; Wilson v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 547, 160 S. W. Rep., 454; Hampton v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 189, 161 S. W. Rep., 966; Newsome v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 453, 162 S. W. Rep., 891, and a great many other cases. There is no question raised which can he considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitehead v. State, 168 S.W. 530, 74 Tex. Crim. 475, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349 (Tex. 1914).

168 S.W. 530 (Whitehead v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
160 S.W. 454 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Stephens v. State
158 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Durham and Harris v. State
155 S.W. 222 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Hampton v. State
161 S.W. 965 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
De Friend v. State
153 S.W. 881 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Newsome v. State
162 S.W. 891 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Hampton v. State
161 S.W. 966 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)