Whitehead v. State
This text of 168 S.W. 530 (Whitehead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for unlawfully cutting timber on the land of another and fined $10.
What purports to be a statement of facts, and bills of exceptions were not filed until nearly ninety days after "the court, at which appellant was tried, adjourned. The State makes a motion to strike them out on that account, which is granted. Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222; DeFriend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329, 153 S. W. Rep., 881; Stephens v. State, 158 S. W. Rep., 531-532; Wilson v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 547, 160 S. W. Rep., 454; Hampton v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 189, 161 S. W. Rep., 966; Newsome v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 453, 162 S. W. Rep., 891, and a great many other cases. There is no question raised which can he considered in the absence of a statement of facts.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 S.W. 530, 74 Tex. Crim. 475, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.