Whitehead v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Whitehead v. State

1920 OK CR 28, 186 P. 970, 17 Okla. Crim. 704, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 27

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 9, 1920

DocketNo. A-3371.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 28 (Whitehead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitehead v. State, 1920 OK CR 28, 186 P. 970, 17 Okla. Crim. 704, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 27 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 'in error, Geo. Whitehead, was convicted in the county court of Ottawa county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating- liquor from one place in said county to another place therein, and by the judgment of the court was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days, and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court on May 27, 1918, a petition in error with case-made. No brief -has been filed. When the case was called for- final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reasons stated, the motion to affirm is sustained. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 'in error, Geo. Whitehead, was convicted in the county court of Ottawa county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating- liquor from one place in said county to another place therein, and by the judgment of the court was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days, and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court on May 27, 1918, a petition in error with case-made. No brief -has been filed. When the case was called for- final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reasons stated, the motion to affirm is sustained. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 28, 186 P. 970, 17 Okla. Crim. 704, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.