Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Whitehead v. State

Whitehead v. State

904 So. 2d 656, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10074, 2005 WL 1522837
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 2005
DocketNo. 4D04-796
StatusPublished

This text of 904 So. 2d 656 (Whitehead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whitehead v. State, 904 So. 2d 656, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10074, 2005 WL 1522837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Garry Whitehead appeals his sentence for burglary of a dwelling, contending that the written judgment of sentence did not conform to the court’s oral pronouncement. We agree. The court orally pronounced a sentence of 21.150 months of imprisonment. The written judgment provided for a sentence of 22 months. We therefore reverse and remand for correction of the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. Rackins v. State, 851 So.2d 292, 292 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

WARNER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rackins v. State
851 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
904 So. 2d 656, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10074, 2005 WL 1522837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitehead-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.